What I like about James Luna is his inclusion of himself as a piece of "art" in many of his displays. He feels like performance and installation are the loudest ways to make an impression, the best ways to get one's point across. And including himself in these performances/installations is crucial because what does he know better than himself? How can he speak of issues that mean a lot to him personally, without being personally involved? (summarized from an article
here) As an Indian/Mexican-American, he has a lot to say about race, culture, prejudice and society.
In Artifact Piece, he places himself on display, as if it were a Natural History Museum.
|
(english.emory.edu) |
He labeled places on his body, like a scar from "excessive drinking," etc. It really makes me question the world of the museum. Why can't one put a live human on display? Why isn't it weird to put dead humans on display? We feel a kinship with living beings, and when they pass on it's an almost vile thing to be around their bodies. It makes me question what's important.